On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:49:55PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
The akefile rules for %.o and flashrom.o are identical. Let %.o handle flashrom.o as well.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Index: flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile
--- flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile (Revision 624) +++ flashrom-makefile_cleanup/Makefile (Arbeitskopie) @@ -70,11 +70,8 @@
FEATURE_LIBS = $(shell LANG=C grep -q "FTDISUPPORT := yes" .features && printf "%s" "-lftdi")
-flashrom.o: flashrom.c .features
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< $(SVNDEF)
%.o: %.c .features
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ $(SVNDEF)
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(FEATURE_CFLAGS) $(SVNDEF) -o $@ -c $<
clean: rm -f $(PROGRAM) *.o
Ah, more simple flashrom things that even i understand...
Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen libv@skynet.be
Why am i seeing your patches double in your emails? Np for small ones, but for a big patch, seeing it double might be confusing.
Luc Verhaegen.