joe@smittys.pointclark.net wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com:
joe@smittys.pointclark.net wrote:
Here is /proc/cpuinfo from the original bios:
processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 11 model name : Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 733MHz stepping : 4 cpu MHz : 731.076 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse bogomips : 1445.88
What would my cpu_device_id be then? 0x06B4 right?
Yep, I think so.
Can this be combined with the model_69x then? They are very close.
Probably. If it works, go with it.
Or possibly we can condense them into a model_6xxm (that's an m on the end for mobile)??
Sorry, too lazy to restart the reply. That doesn't seem like a great idea, seems like it could have bad repercussions with p4s that use 0x06xx model numbers, if they aren't compatible. Also the 69x are non-mobile cpus.
-Corey
Are you sure? Looks like the only CPU that calls the model_69x and model_6dx is from the socket_mPGA479M. I'm assuming the "M" on the end is for "Mobile", also considering the processors mentioned are:
From model_6dx_init.c { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06D6 }, /* Pentium M on 90nm with 2MiB of L2 cache */
From model_69x_init.c { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x0695 }, /* Pentium M */
It just seems a little silly to setup a whole new directory of exactly the same code as these. Except mine would say:
model_6bx_init.c { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 0x06B4 }, /* Mobile Celeron FCBGA 479*/
Corey, you should be able to relate with all your i82801xx code condensing. Good work by the way (if I hadden't mentioned that already):-)
Thanks - Joe
Gar, you caught me off guard, I was working from memory and I shouldn't be. You're right, of course, but please don't use the 69x, use 6xx instead. The 69x appears to be exactly the same as 6xx and 6dx, except that the 6xx has the microcode updates.
-Corey