Hello Patrick and Alexander,
I am sorry for the late reply to your answers.
We are looking into this as well. From what I have seen so far I got the feeling LAVA is a bit "heavy" given the tasks that need to be performed. Please note that I am new to the LAVA system.
Best Regards, Wim Vervoorn
-----Original Message----- From: Patrick Rudolph [mailto:siro@das-labor.org] Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 7:34 PM To: Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens lynxis@fe80.eu Cc: Wim Vervoorn wvervoorn@eltan.com; coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: LAVA support
Hi Wim, the lava as QA system is still being worked on, but currently has the lowest priority. While some hardware has been automated for firmware testing, some glue code is still missing.
Some details can be found here: https://9esec.io/blog/bios-test-station/
Regards, Patrick
On 2019-11-01 04:58 PM, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote:
Hi Wim,
The coreboot site refers to the LAVA site as the QA system. It looks like some attempts have been made and then abandoned.
that's so far true. I've setted up a lava environment some years ago, but didn't had the time to continue and maintain it.
Does anyone know the current status? Did this not work out or is there another reason not to add additional platforms to the environment?
It worked out to test coreboot. Patrick was also looking into it this year. (CC: Patrick/siro).
Maybe it's time to do another run of integrating it into the coreboot CI?
Best, lynxis
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org