we made a decision in the early days to NOT include the chip part name in the function names. This was not a mistake or omission, it was a deliberate design choice.
The reason to name things this way is because a board is composed of a set of parts, and the partname is in the file name path. Hence, the board can be constructed of files calling functions with generic names, and the generic functions are provided by files chosen in the config. In some cases, it has proven trivial to port a mainboard to a new chipset by changing only the config to use a different chip. The fact that the function name did not include the chipname made this trivial.
If we think that we really need the chip name in the function, ok, but it's a change in the way we designed the build process. Maybe it's a change we have to make. I am not yet convinced.
thanks
ron