On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:12 -0600, Ken.Fuchs@bench.com wrote:
Uwe Hermann wrote:
We could do that (I removed the old LPCflasher wiki page), but is it really needed? The page explicitly said that there are no external links to it (or there shouldn't be) and this is all work in progress.
If possible, I'd like to get rid of that page ASAP (before more people bookmark it or link to it). If there are already many links to it we can add a redirect, but I'd like to avoid it. Everybody should bookmark the Paraflasher page.
Bookmarking is not the biggest problem here.
Most people would find LPCFlasher via Goggle:
http://www.google.com/search?q=LPCFlasher&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t... .mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Sorry, there are already dozens of links to the LPCFlasher Wiki page, though obviously not every hit in this search includes one.
A redirect may be the only option now. When new original, content to the LPCFlasher page is added, a reference to LPCFlasher being the original name of ParaFlasher would in addition be required.
This mess is the result of the coreboot mailing list being archived and mirrored on many different servers.
Most of those googles only point to the mailing list. Do a search of the link directly for more accurate results
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=org&q=www.coreboot.org/LPCfla...
which also point to a bunch of point to the mailing list and only a couple of links one of which is my site that I have already updated. I don't think we really have much to worry about. But id Uwe wants to put a redirect, feel free.
Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org