#20: Cleanup of all CHIP_NAME() entries ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: uwe | Owner: uwe Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Cosmetic fixes Component: code | Version: v2 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Include_gantt: 0 | Dependencies: Due_assign: DD/MM/YYYY | Due_close: DD/MM/YYYY ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Comment (by anonymous):
In my opinion we should go further and drop the CHIP_NAME macro
completely.
So instead of CHIP_NAME("Via VT8263") it should just read "Via VT8263"
No, it would read .name = "Via VT8263" . _Always_ use designated initialisers, that's what they're there for (well there are exceptions of course, but those are just that: exceptions).
The CHIP_NAME macro was invented at a time when we were really tight in
rom space, but it is obviously the wrong approach.
I don't see how a macro would help any in this regard?
Segher