On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:25:55 -0600, Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:01:41PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
are the payloads built with omit frame pointer?
it's not a good thing if we have to sync how payloads are built with how coreboot is built.
SeaBIOS does use -fomit-frame-pointer (enabling it provides noticably better code generation). However, I don't think this is related to the payload at all. The frame-pointer option controls what gcc puts into %ebp, and SeaBIOS doesn't care at all what's in that register when it is launched.
yes, we may still be looking at a symptom of a different problem
Maybe we should be asking for successes instead of failures. Has anyone been able to boot any payload with v2 and -fomit-frame-pointer?
If it is in the FILO CC flags, I built it the other day, and it is booting just fine for me.