San Mehat san@google.com writes:
Reworking the attribute is actually causing a huge pain in the ass with relocations it looks like. I'm going to see if i can have the amdk8 MCT code return the dimm_mask information back to the board via sdram_initialize().
I could either just have sdram_initialize() return a merged version of dimm_mask which would limit the number of dimms supported, or I could pass in an additional non-static 'population' structure which i think may be better.
Any thoughts?.. I'm going to modify my stuff to pass in a new structure in the meantime..
Is there any reason not to simply query for the data back at the mainboard level? It isn't like the discovery is hard.
Eric