Dear coreboot community,
I have been trying to merge few mainboard for some time, however I find it difficult to get reviews (and lead it towards merging), despite fulfilling all requests like Documentation entry.
Example: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/30360/13#message-7720bf7ed3f447a878...
I have rebased it, added Documentation entry, however nobody touched it since I lastly updated it in November.
Following the same convention I have updated a Protectli FW6 Kaby Lake board patch today: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33839/
Probably this week I will also update another mainboard patch with documentation: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32076
Are there any exit criteria which initial mainboard commit should fulfil to be considered good quality and complete? I have also added changes to MAINTAINERS file (for the FW6) to indicate that these patches will not become a piece of unused and unmaintained code.
The first two patches are solid and all issues documented. All of them will receive an entry in MAINTAINERS file. I would very appreciate a little bit of your attention on them and possibly reviews.
I especially need the Kaby Lake board, because 3mdeb will soon begin upstreaming changes to support Boot Guard and Protectli FW6 is our reference platform. I don't want the mainboard patches to be a burden or blocking any related efforts. So I kindly ask for a tiny bit of your time to have a look at these patches. Let's improve coreboot together and make it a competitive (and even better) replacement of proprietary BIOS solutions.
With kind regards,