j
k
j a
j l
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:58, Dave Aubin wrote: ...Hi, Why it starts from c000:fffd ? It should starts from c000:0003
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:58, Dave Aubin wrote:
Hi,
Why it starts from c000:fffd ? It should starts from c000:0003
this is interesting since 0xfffd is the same as (0-3)
bug somewhere?
ron
Back to the thread
Back to the list