-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 05/17/2018 06:20 PM, Banik, Subrata wrote:
Hi Subrata,
FSP2.0, I'm following Librem Purism options since they seem to boot the same SoC. They use KabyLake FSP obtained by get_blobss.sh [1], if you think this is incorrect then I would like to know why, because it may mean that Pursim code is also incorrect from Intel point of view.
SKL won't be compatible with KBL FSP. Please don’t try to use KBL FSP and mix match with SKL Coreboot. No one tested that combination.
You saw my boot log, so what coreboot platform would be good reference for my development? BTW last SKL FSP commit was almost 2 years ago.
@Youness, I would be glad to know what is Purims take on that. According to above message usage of KBL FSP is wrong approach for i7-6500. Maybe I'm reading/using get_blobs incorrectly?
Best Regards, - -- Piotr Król Embedded Systems Consultant https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com