On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Georgi patrick@georgi-clan.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 06.10.2009, 13:52 -0600 schrieb Myles Watson:
I don't think we should have two copies of the device tree. I removed the second copy in Tyan s289x boards. I also removed rom_address statements that were pre-CBFS. Abuild tested.
I think the original idea why this wasn't done is to allow sconfig to develop from there.
I'm letting my ignorance show again. I don't know anything about sconfig.
But I hope we'll get this switch done quick enough that sconfig changes can wait until newconfig is gone...
That would be nice.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi patrick.georgi@coresystems.de
Rev 4727. Thanks, Myles