On 22/09/07 22:19 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 12.09.2007 21:41, Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 10:39 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
hi, we rejected this idea, right? I am trying to catch up on un-acked patches.
What about adding then a version string (to a fixed position) in stage1? For user-space tools to handle multiple versions.
I still like the versioning idea. Can we discuss it again since there was no final rejection?
I still like it. I don't mind putting the version in the header at all - we don't need an 8 character magic value - we can truncate it and put the header in there - we probably only need two characters anyway - how many header versions do we think we're going to have? :)
Jordan