Re: [coreboot] Romfs -> cbfs conversion

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 15.04.2009 23:50 Uhr, Myles Watson wrote:
> > I think there is, if the file format changes. If the contents is
> > always the same type I agree it's better to have only one name.
>
> In this case the difference is that one doesn't have a format.  In
> both cases the bootblock is in the same place and the code inside the
> image has to know where everything else is.

Absolutely agreed. Adding another file extension will confuse the users,
even though we might successfully lie to ourselves about educating them.