On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:43:58AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
Understood. What I was getting at was that it may be quicker to just forget v2 and work with new shinyness in v3.
Yeah, good point. I'm playing with CAR for Intel CPUs right now, if it canbe made to work soonish in v3, I'll port over the 440BX boards ASAP.
Sure, I'm willing to also provide patches to eliminate any uselessly duplicated code from v3.
My point was that there is little if any duplicate code in v3 and that the v3 design is intended to minimize it - working on v3 is much more interesting, since it solves many of the problems in v2.
Yes, I fully agree, but I still don't want to let v2 bitrot. _Most_ work should indeed rather go into v3, but v2 should not be completely ignored (yet).
Uwe.