On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Patrick Georgi patrick@georgi-clan.de wrote:
My next step is to make copy_and_run cbfs aware. That would push the coreboot_ram part of both stages into cbfs already, significantly decreasing the bootblock size.
Thanks Patrick. This sounds great.
this is the next sensible step to make. I think I jumped a bit ahead with the XIP patch.
It sparked a good discussion and hopefully clarified where we're going.
Thanks, Myles