* Uwe Hermann uwe@hermann-uwe.de [061031 19:22]:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:14:39AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
If we're dropping it let's drop it. All these red lines give a misleading impression.
I agree _if_ the board never worked at all and there's no chance that someone will work on it over the next 1-2 years or so.
But I would _not_ remove it (from svn) if it already worked at some point (or parts of it).
It did not. And it's still in the revision history.
Currently the wiki lists everything that has a directory in src/mainboard. Maybe we should list only those boards which actually work, at least partially...
abuild tests for $LBROOT/src/mainboard/${VENDOR}/${MAINBOARD}/BROKEN
and ignores boards with that line
Maybe it should read $LBROOT/src/mainboard/${VENDOR}/${MAINBOARD}/UNSUPPORTED
and be a basis whether this should appear in the web list or not.
Also,...
would it make sense to generate the web page from the repository, by adding a boardinfo.xml file in each board subdirectory with the information?
This information could be used to create a multitude of pages,.. for example the qa.linuxbios.org things as well...
Stefan