Re: status information

[Ronald G. Minnich]

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> We have a hard limit that at least the romcc part of the codebase
> needs to run below that so we can enable more than 64KiB of flash.

yah. But romcc does a good job. When I move c_payload to 0xfffe0000 there 
was a HUGE amount of room left for romcc ...
> It is my intention once I get the minor details firmed up to reexamine
> romcc and see what I can do size wise.  I have come close to getting
> things smaller but there is some little glitch preventing things from
> working :(

I think romcc is pretty darn good as is ... we just need to move c_payload 
(IMHO).

ron