On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Kevin O'Connor kevin@koconnor.net wrote:
I'm wondering what you felt was lacking in your previous idea of passing a new stack location/execution address into disable_car()?
When I floated the idea last year everyone hated it :-)
Also, in an earlier email I suggested the possibility of switching the stack before calling disable_car:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-September/038611.html
calling disable_car needs a stack. Where did it come from? You might as well put all the nasty code in one place.
ron