On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
I would rather have removed the sharp, if you were going to remove something, but I would rather have not removed either of them.
Should I revert or rename the sharp file to 82802ab.c?
I think we should revert. The sharp file may not work for 802ab
We really need to add another field to struct flashchip: "tested". Right now, most chips are either completely untested or only detection was tested.
I like that, and then an option to flashrom: ./flashrom --flashchipstatus or some such: and then you get: chip (probe, read, write) chip2 (probe)
and so on
ron