Re: [coreboot] [URGENT] Full List of AMD-based boards that are going to be removed from coreboot unless people cough up a board status update

[Piotr Król]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/28/2018 03:46 PM, ron minnich wrote:

Hi Ron,
> This is a *personal* opinion, not supported by anyone else I
> suppose, but:
>
> I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that people send in board
> status 2 times a year.
>
> That's it. It makes it easier for potential users, and for people 
> maintaining the tree.
>
> Sound ok?

Twice a year sounds ok. I still think this should be tied to release
cycle, which IMO is not clear at this point. If release cycle would be
similar to Linux then I would imagine status update should be sent at
- -rcX stage and then after stable release.

We will see how status board update will evolve.

Best Regards,
- -- 
Piotr Król
Embedded Systems Consultant
https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5CyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----