On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Two comments about the style while it is not yet carved in stone.
- Can you prefix every constructor with "struct constructor"?
sure.
- Can we possibly use anonymous unions to get rid of that obnoxious .u?
(separate patch)
seperately.
Note one thing the arrays in the individual files got you. You could drag along ALL types of a (e.g.) the intel southbridge even when you only specified one of them in a dts. Now, to get all the seperate constructors, you're going to have to specify that you use all those parts.
That's why I did the array, I now recall, but it probably confused everyone, as did this explanation. So never mind.
It's possible we should just go back to linker sets :-) ewwww.
ron