On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:13 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo jorgefm@cirsa.com wrote:
Hi Marshall
- amd/bettong removal, should it happen, triggers CarrizoPI (00660F01) removal
We ought to have all the backward-compatibility for CZ and the Embedded variants landed in stoneyridge and amd_blobs now. I think it should be a fairly easy changeover for amd/bettong from cpu/nb/sb to soc/amd /stoneyridge if someone is able to spend the time on it. The older 0060F01 AGESA was superseded years ago by StoneyPI, and has practically no chance of ever being updated again. Padmelon may be the preferred >board now but I believe there are likely still Bettongs in the field.
I would like to try to do the modifications to avoid bettong removal. I'll have some time this Xmas holidays to spend on it. But I'm still struggling with the minimal changes to be able to generate a board_status report because no commits I've done are merged. I don't know exactly how to proceed to avoid deprecation...
AMD is not valueing my work or fulfilling their part of the agreements, so I am leaving these size 13 shoes behind for someone to fill. From what I know, the only persons I could recommend for further binaryPI related reviews are not being for these tasks either.
Regards, Kyösti Mälkki