ron minnich wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 12:28 PM, Stefan Reinauer stepan@coresystems.de wrote:
Do we ever want to define devices and compile them in that we don't want to use?
That's what I can't figure out. I can't recall why that test is there.
That code was heavily restructured. Lets kick the test and use the default constructor. If that doesnt work out we can always go back. If we have to do those excessive add of standard behavior orgies, something must be wrong, so we won't break something that is not broken ;-)