On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Ward Vandewege ward@gnu.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 04:45:44PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're missing part of the patch, there should be a settings.h included, right?
no,that is generated by the >> in the patch.
I kind of like this. But, if the python is run twice, do you get the file twice as large? There's no "zero out the file" step from what i can see.
Hmm. Seems like replacing the >> by > should fix that.
Seems that way to me, but it's worth testing :-)
ron