On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:49:04PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Completely forking the codebase into separate projects is something I'd like to avoid because we already have too few development resources.
Full ack.
Suggestion: After 1.0, we create
- a development branch where people can go wild with rewriting stuff
- a stable branch with incremental changes where breakage is not allowed.
Nah, overkill and not really useful IMO.
I personally believe more in the incremental approach with minimal changes.
Ack. No patch should ever break the build or runtime-behaviour of flashrom. That doesn't mean we can't do radical changes, such changes just have to be done in a manner which doesn't break flashrom, either in small incremental steps or in bigger patch-series which do all changes at once. But we don't need (or want, IMO) branches for either...
Uwe.