On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:50:46PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
This makes more sense, but..
What was the reason for introducing multiple dts files for a single chip again?
Only the C struct name limitations?
*scratches forehead* I kind of want the single dts per chip back..
yep, me too. that's a concern. Also, I worry about people having to deal with the nasty little thicket of tons of little file, all (mostly) alike.
Full ACK. One dts per chip, one per board. Many small files is not the way to go, we worked hard in the past to reduce this cluttering, and rightly so.
Uwe.