On Feb 12, 2008 3:02 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 3:15 PM, ron minnich rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 11:13 AM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
mainboard-vendor = "Emulation"; mainboard-name = "QEMU x86";
Sure, I am fine with that. Comments?
pci@1,0 {pci@1,0 --> dev 1 function 0
why shorten device to dev and not fuction to func? is it possible to set it up so people/developers can use either dev or device?
I confused you. This line
pci@1,0 --> dev 1 function 0
is an explanatory comment. It is not in the dts. Here is the dts again.
/{ mainboard-vendor = "Emulation"; mainboard-name = "QEMU x86"; constructor = "qemuvga_constructors"; cpus {}; domain@0 { /config/("northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/dts"); bus@0 { pci@0,0 { }; pci@1,0 { /config/("southbridge/intel/i82371eb/dts"); }; }; }; };
That's the whole file.
Let's try to bring this to closure. The score so far.
Stepan: is ok with '@' syntax (as are segher etc. ) Ron: is not that concerned either way as long as an alternative carl-daniel, peter, corey: do not like @ syntax but need to propose a reasonable alternative (they have tried but not totally there yet) which does not make the parser hard to modify.
ron