On 3/3/20 4:33 PM, Michal Zygowski wrote:
Dear coreboot community,
Hi Michal,
(...)
The first two patches are solid and all issues documented. All of them will receive an entry in MAINTAINERS file. I would very appreciate a little bit of your attention on them and possibly reviews.
I especially need the Kaby Lake board, because 3mdeb will soon begin upstreaming changes to support Boot Guard and Protectli FW6 is our reference platform. I don't want the mainboard patches to be a burden or blocking any related efforts. So I kindly ask for a tiny bit of your time to have a look at these patches. Let's improve coreboot together and make it a competitive (and even better) replacement of proprietary BIOS solutions.
Thank you for this email.
As the owner of 3mdeb, I would like to add $0.02. We are a small organization, but we have no problem to use part of our profit, for engineers to review code and support other community members (also those commercial ones). New customers often ask about our effectiveness in community, the number of maintained boards and the amount of code we have contributed. If the community keeps our reviews not merged, we cannot use that as proof of our engagement and quality. We always try to convince customers to support the upstreaming process and secure budget for that, but in light of no interest in merging code, customers would rather avoid that cost and keep forks on their repositories. This doesn't contribute to project health.
Some of our patches got no attention for over 1.5 years.
As coreboot leader, Michal can give +2, but we were hesitant to be the judge in our case and use that to merge our code. What we are asking is a decision about those patches - if anything is wrong we will fix that.
We believe this is a little bit bigger problem that should be addressed by coreboot leaders since it reflects the healthiness of the community and agenda of participating entities.
Best Regards,