On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:05:07PM +0000, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
On 07/03/12 01:06, Stefan Reinauer (stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org) wrote:
NEW/FIXED now reads consistent values: ebda_addr=0xf6000 lowmem=0x100000
OK, now this worries me. Any time you move away from the classic PC memory map you are risking problems.
First of all, INITIAL_EBDA_SEGMENT has been 0xF600 prior to this change.
I believe loading a SeaBIOS payload will obliterate the coreboot EBDA at this location. SeaBIOS almost certainly replaces/updates the BDA and will position its own EBDA at an appropriate place.
Jonathan Kollasch