Re: [coreboot] Rev 4099+ Broken Tree?

[Rudolf Marek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> If you revert that patch it fixes the problem, right?

Yes
> My interpretation: you no longer zero low memory because you don't
> want to zero low memory on a resume. This is good for resume, and very
> bad for cold boot.

Yes seems you are right. But I believe the ECC setup should care about that
somewhere?

But why it works for the rest of memory? The rest of memory is never cleared.
Only to TOPK. Thats why I assumed its OK to change that and clear memory from
_RAMBASE to TOPK and not from 0 to TOPK

Rudolf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknyC0oACgkQ3J9wPJqZRNXyvACferKzk+w69GhiZ7j39VJP+Zuo
QlAAoKHWeV3z+QwkjYCxQ+RKgPIkB0V9
=iBuV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----