Well...yes there is a reason the GA-M57SLI doesn't really work for me. To see why take a look at Ward's tutorial at http://linuxbios.org/GIGABYTE_GA-M57SLI-S4_Build_Tutorial
The obstacles are obvious from the tutorial.
If somebody could make these modifications and ship me a working board, I could reimburse them for their trouble.
Anyone like to quote me a price for this service ?
Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "Corey Osgood" corey.osgood@gmail.com To: "Robert Vogel" vogel@ct.metrocast.net Cc: "ron minnich" rminnich@gmail.com; "LinuxBIOS mailinglist" linuxbios@linuxbios.org; "Janek Kozicki" janek_listy@wp.pl Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:19 PM Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] From slashdot - a company possibly using linuxbios.
Robert Vogel wrote:
I'm catching up on my reading, so there has been some delay since the last post to this thread.
One of the reasons why the LinuxBios project seems so large is that it attempts to satisfy the requirements of many different mother boards. Yet, it has not come up with a machine that is easily available. I don't see anything close to a desktop machine for the consumer yet.
Gigabyte GA-M57SLI??? Is there some reason it doesn't fit your requirements?
-Corey
Is there a good reason why a single, perhaps custom, motherboard running LinuxBios would not be sufficient for, say, most desktop users ? The chipset could be selected so that there are no hiding places. If the Bios itself is socketed and replaceable, why should it not be a device that could be instantly on ?
Ideally, an independent organization such as the FSF might certify a machine that is completely open...and therefore trustworthy. It wouldn't need to be backwards compatible with DOS nor would it run windows. It could skip cutting-edge graphics so that there should be no NDAs. Is that possible ?
Thoughts ?
-- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios