On 07.11.2008 04:18, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:18:34AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 01:17:46AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
BTW, in previous emails I highlighted some disadvantages with a tighter integration of seabios and coreboot. Could you elaborate on the reasons why you think this is the best option?
Simple:
[...]
Thanks Stefan. I appreciate your feedback.
One random comment:
and we can avoid having to return from seabios to coreboot and thus not have to worry abou them "stomping" on each other.
We do have to worry about that in all scenarios though.
Just assuming it's ok for SeaBIOS to overwrite memory that coreboot filled is not good enough.
I'm more worried about the option roms corrupting memory that coreboot uses.
Checksums of coreboot memory before and after option rom execution could help.
Regards, Carl-Daniel