On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 05:02:11PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 29.08.2007 16:47, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 08:17:45PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Think of all the MCP55 boards. RAM works. North- and southbridge are supported. The "little things" are what keep us from supporting them completely. A generic MCP55 port which loads the payload (additional board init etc.) over serial can be the ideal starting point.
Why? I don't really see a use for this. If someone is able to run such a payload, build LinuxBIOS, test patches etc. it's not much additional work to just add proper support for the board in the first place. No need for such a "test-payload", I think.
The "you can always reflash the old BIOS" feeling gives confidence to porters who might not have a replacement chip handy.
Ah, that thing. I think I misread the whole thread. Anyway, this would require a working flashrom-like implementation as payload (which in itself is a very cool thing and Someone Should Do It(tm)).
Can you elaborate? Where is the MAC address stored? On which boards? I doubt that all boards out there do this. What happens if you download a BIOS image from $VENDOR website? Does the flasher contain special code to deal with the MAC address?
The MAC address is stored in flash for almost all CK804/MCP55 boards. All of these boards flashed with LB probably have the same MAC address. See src/southbridge/nvidia/ck804/romstrap.inc and src/southbridge/nvidia/mcp55/romstrap.inc for details. On some of these boards, the MAC address is stored in a separate EEPROM, but you can't count on that.
Hm, good candidate for the wiki FAQ and for the flashrom README then. Can you create a patch for this?
Thanks, Uwe.