Re: [coreboot] memtest86 reading 0k memory

[Kevin O'Connor]

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:03:43AM -0600, Martin Roth wrote:
> In regards to other approaches, instead of removing coreboot's memory
> tables, would it be better if SeaBIOS updated the tables with what it had
> changed instead of deleting the tables?

It's technically possible, but I don't think it's a good idea.  It
would be complex to do and it could lead to confusion when
troubleshooting.

As far as I know, only memtest86 has this problem.  Is it possible to
get your patch into its upstream repo?

-Kevin