On 16.11.2007 01:17, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:13:41PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Improve printk documentation to match code realities.
Nak, for some hunks.
At some point I hope that LB printk will end up in the kernel message buffer. Then, we are able to handle anything from time zero, so let's not remove any printks. The tidying is good though!
printk() from time zero (to a buffer) will be enabled by one of my future patches. But right now the code should be consistent.
- printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Done %s\n", __FUNCTION__);
Besides that, the only printk I removed will be directly followed by the LinuxBIOS banner about two instructions later and the printk itself is not as informative as I'd like. I will re-add a printk in that function with the late rprintk buffering patch.
Regards, Carl-Daniel