On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Corey Osgood corey.osgood@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:16:19 -0700, "Myles Watson" mylesgw@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org
wrote:
Arrh, Looks like both of the 82830 boards are broken. What do I need to do to
fix
them?
Do they still break after my last two patches? I thought they were
fixed.
I was going by Corey's last abuild log. I appologize if you have fixed them since then.
I don't know what was going on. abuild ran fine for me. I ran it again
and sure enough, it breaks. Sorry about that.
rca/rm4100 is still broken. All you should need to do is check that all the functions are properly declared, either by including their declarations in a header or an extern(al) declaration. Making the change in Carl-Daniel's patch will tell you very quickly if you got them all or not ;)
Myles, those patches when applied with Maggi's break the amd pistachio and dbm690t. New abuild log with all 6? patches applied. I accidentally ran it a second time and lost the original log, so don't mind the "previously ok" comments, those boards were actually rebuilt and succeeded once.
I didn't try with Maggi's patches because you said they broke other boards.
Thanks, Myles