Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom: Use chipaddr_t instead of volatile uint8_t *

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 16.05.2009 20:06, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:29:14AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > chipaddr is my favourite, though, because our accessor functions are
> > named chip_read* and chip_write* and this would give us some naming
> > consistency. Of course, said consistency can also be achieved by
> > renaming the chip accessor functions to flash_read* and flash_write*.
> >
> > The name is a not important for me as long as we can kill volatile
> > uint8_t * with it.
> > :-)
> >
> > Do you want me to resend, and with which name?
>
> I'd say let's use flashaddr for now, but IMHO either name is fine.
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann

Thanks, committed in r519.

Apologies to everyone who has to readjust his/her patches against the tree.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel