Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Tread carefully here. e820 gets a memory map, but coreboot tables are much more generic. Please don't start adding memory entries to the coreboot table!
I don't think I get your point.
Hah! No wonder. I did not make any sense at all there!
What's wrong about adding memory map specific entries to the memory map part of the coreboot table?
As long as they are indeed memory map entries it's certainly the right place. But if some information is or should be available elsewhere then we should think twice before adding it to the memory map.
//Peter