Peter Stuge wrote:
Kevin O'Connor wrote:
If one defines it in the coreboot table, it'll show up in the e820 map. So, I guess the best thing would be to add this support to coreboot.
Tread carefully here. e820 gets a memory map, but coreboot tables are much more generic. Please don't start adding memory entries to the coreboot table!
I don't think I get your point.
What's wrong about adding memory map specific entries to the memory map part of the coreboot table?