On 15.01.2009 03:49, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:09:10AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:14:12AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
r3861
..just horrible..
Acked-By Luc Verhaegen libv@skynet.be
Heck, i tried getting some sleep after seeing this but failed.
This change goes in against every instinct i have.
diffstat tells me this: board_enable.c | 413 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 362 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Daniel, you just bloated an almost overseeable table 7fold. If you claim that you still have any oversight and any control, then you're lying.
Rest assured, I'll sleep well tonight.
Luc Verhaegen. Who just happens to be the original creator of this table.
The new table has a format which elicits a WTF for several entries. The reason for the WTF (content, not style) was there already, but the old style didn't make it that obvious. Making things obvious is good. Making strange code painful to look at is good.
Regards, Carl-Daniel Who thinks lots of lines with =0 or =NULL can be removed now which was impossible with the old style.