On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
One thing I see as a problem in both versions is how I can specify different settings for each instance of a chip appearing multiple times on a board. (I may be misinterpreting struct name generation...)
I checked and the path is part of the instance. So if you have superio@2e{ etc. } superio@4e { etc. }
and they're the same part, you still get two structs, one which looks like: struct superio_winbond_hf86whatever_config ioport_2e and struct superio_winbond_hf86whatever_config ioport_4e
i.e you get the struct (the kind) and the path is flattened into the name to make it unique (the instance).
ron