Fredrik, you should be able to work around this by calling flashrom -c MX25L4005
Yes, it does. I even tried that before, but forgot to mention it.
The patch I sent does not have anything to do with the MX25L4005 problem you're seeing because that problem was introduced in r3291. Can you signoff this patch since it works for you?
I see. I thought it was related, since the patch was for SPI in some generality. Sure thing, then. I'm not sure what to do in this particular case, though -- am I supposed to re-quote the entire patch with your sign as well? If not, I'm just adding it here:
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Tolf fredrik@dolda2000.com
(OT: Though, I have to question the utility of these signatures. I've questioned it silently for myself for the Linux kernel team as well, but at least they use Git which seals the signature along with the entire development history with SHA-1, while Coreboot's signatures seem very much looser than that.)