Why do you need kexec in the ROM? Is there a good reason not to put it on the same device that holds the kernel you'll kexec to?
Myles
_____
From: Lu, Yinghai [mailto:yinghai.lu@amd.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 7:28 PM To: Lu, Yinghai; ron minnich; yhlu Cc: myles@mouselemur.cs.byu.edu; LinuxBIOS Subject: RE: [LinuxBIOS] Tyan s2892 the OLPC way
Please check the build payload for amd64.
It includes: IDE, and SATA(nvidia). And only 32kbytes left. ---- assume 1Mbytes space, and linuxbios will use 96kbytes.
Todo:
put the kexec tools into the initrd. (32kbytes)
Hope to use ron't update mkelfImage to get more 32kbytes for kexec tools
YH
_____
From: linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org [mailto:linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org] On Behalf Of Lu, Yinghai Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:09 PM To: ron minnich; yhlu Cc: myles@mouselemur.cs.byu.edu; LinuxBIOS Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Tyan s2892 the OLPC way
Ron,
Where is patch for mkelfImage that can take vmlinux instead of bzImage?
YH
_____
From: linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org [mailto:linuxbios-bounces@linuxbios.org] On Behalf Of ron minnich Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 6:34 PM To: yhlu Cc: myles@mouselemur.cs.byu.edu; LinuxBIOS Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Tyan s2892 the OLPC way
On 10/29/06, yhlu yinghailu@gmail.com wrote:
but the one still include VSA and linuxbios in it.
busybox
you want this.
kernel kexec-boot-loader
you want this
kexec-tools mkelfimage uclibc
do i need kexec-boot-loader?
yes
If you look in deploy, for now, you can use the payload, which is built without containing linuxbios or vsa. That is how I got a working payload for ultra40.
What we need to do with buildrom is extend it so we can have a config file for a given platform, that builds the proper kernel AND linuxbios, and has payloads like VSA as an OPTION. I think this is easy. I did it (sort of) for qemu.
ron