coreboot March 2016

coreboot@coreboot.org

43 participants
117 discussions

Please do not tag Memtest86+ commit message summaries with *Memtest86+*
by Paul Menzel 30 Mar '16

30 Mar '16

Dear coreboot folks, A lot of change sets to the new Memtest86+ project [1] hosted on the coreboot infrastructure have been posted. Martin and Ben, thank you for that! The commit message summaries are prepended with *Memtest86+* making the git history look like below. ``` $ git log --oneline 11248a0 Memtest86+: coreboot.c - Change var name to not mask other variable f7b770a Memtest86+: Match function declaration with function definition 04f7f14 Memtest86+: Fix bit field that was getting masked off 6959343 Memtest86+: Fix non-ANSI C function declarations 5bb29b2 memtest86+: rewrite popup popdown popclear fea5eb7 memtest86+: Add license file […] ``` I don’t see, how this is helpful. The project is also listed in the Gerrit table [2]. If there is no compelling reason, it’d be really great if this could be left out in future commit message summaries. Thanks, Paul [1] https://review.coreboot.org/#/projects/memtest86plus,dashboards/default [2] https://review.coreboot.org

1 0

Re: [coreboot] VT-d on samus proposal draft
by Huimin Zhang 30 Mar '16

30 Mar '16

Yes, I don't think this project will take many lines of code and so I won't be spending most of my time coding. I expect most of my time to go into learning and research. Hopefully this does not make it an inadequate GSoC project. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner(a)gmx.at> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:58:59 -0700 > Huimin Zhang <thehobn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have my first draft for my GSoC proposal ready. I am quite anxious for > a > > bit of feedback, as I have yet to receive any so far. The link is below. > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R3FCSGfsmwYGU1WmeiGjafrArWN-H9n7IzBtCtM… > > Hello Min, > > I am far from an expert on ACPI but the project you proposed seems to > me as it should be doable in a few weeks maximum. Could you please > explain why you think this will keep you busy for the whole programming > period? What problems do you expect to encounter? > -- > Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner >

1 0

Hello, i am the owner of a toshiba chromebook 2 with coreboot/seabios installed on it, is their a way for me to overclock the chromebook, or build such a bios for it? Thanks Jean
by Jean Reus 29 Mar '16

29 Mar '16

1 0

GSoC proposal: Better support for RISC-V systems
by Jonathan Neuschäfer 29 Mar '16

29 Mar '16

Hi everyone, Below is a link to my GSoC project proposal draft[1]. In essence it's about porting coreboot to a non-emulated board with a RISC-V CPU. If you have any comments, please go ahead and add them to the document. The exact RISC-V board is not yet decided, but I'll fix that as soon as I can. Also, I'm not sure about the timeline. It currently weighs heavily on the first half. Maybe I'm not giving the individual subtasks enough time; maybe I have not listed enough subtasks to fill the three months time frame. Jonathan [1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ex1rP7Y9kX4y5TQCx28uZyqx8iSgih_JyVGnM3f…

3 3

[REGRESSION] firmware: dmi_scan: add SBMIOS entry and DMI tables
by Paul Menzel 28 Mar '16

28 Mar '16

Dear Ivan, dear Jeann, There is an unwanted regression due to commit d7f96f97 (firmware: dmi_scan: add SBMIOS entry and DMI tables). Since Linux kernel 4.2 the utility `cbmem`, used to access information stored in memory, from the coreboot project [1] does not work anymore on a lot of systems as reported in coreboot’s issue tracker as ticket #33 [2]. ``` Failed to mmap /dev/mem: Resource temporarily unavailable ``` Aaron Durbin analyzed on the coreboot mailing list [3]: > > 3) Why is that range set as uncached-minus? Would write-back work? > > Please see this thread: > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2015-September/080381.html > > The actual issue stems from > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drive… > which maintains a persistent mapping of smbios tables. It uses > dmi_remap() which is '#define dmi_remap ioremap' which is where the > uncached-minus PAT entry comes from. It should be using the same > mechanism as the ACPI table mappings which uses ioremap_cache(). It’d be great, if the commit could be reverted, or the code be changed in a way that `cbmem` still works. If I should report this issue somewhere else, please tell me too, and I’ll do my best to follow up there. Thanks, Paul [1] https://www.coreboot.org [2] https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/33 [3] https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2015-October/080568.html

3 2

Re: [coreboot] VT-d on samus proposal draft
by Stefan Tauner 26 Mar '16

26 Mar '16

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:58:59 -0700 Huimin Zhang <thehobn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I have my first draft for my GSoC proposal ready. I am quite anxious for a > bit of feedback, as I have yet to receive any so far. The link is below. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R3FCSGfsmwYGU1WmeiGjafrArWN-H9n7IzBtCtM… Hello Min, I am far from an expert on ACPI but the project you proposed seems to me as it should be doable in a few weeks maximum. Could you please explain why you think this will keep you busy for the whole programming period? What problems do you expect to encounter? -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

1 0

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot on BeagleBone Black
by David Hendricks 25 Mar '16

25 Mar '16

We started on that a few years ago, but ran out of time and abandoned the effort. There are still patches from Sept/Oct 2013 on Gerrit if you are interested. Look for "beaglebone" and "am335x" patches by Gabe Black. The Cubieboard is another dev board you might want to look into. The patches are merged, and I believe the author had it booting Linux. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:05 PM, daoud yessine <yessine.daoud.92(a)gmail.com> wrote: > hi > > Does coreboot work on beaglebone Black ? > How tried It ? > > ᐧ > > -- > coreboot mailing list: coreboot(a)coreboot.org > https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot > -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.

1 0

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot on BeagleBone Black
by daoud yessine 25 Mar '16

25 Mar '16

who * ᐧ 2016-03-26 0:05 GMT+01:00 daoud yessine <yessine.daoud.92(a)gmail.com>: > hi > > Does coreboot work on beaglebone Black ? > How tried It ? > > ᐧ >

1 0

Coreboot on BeagleBone Black
by daoud yessine 25 Mar '16

25 Mar '16

hi Does coreboot work on beaglebone Black ? How tried It ? ᐧ

1 0

IOMMU for AMD APU2 - consulting needed
by Jürgen Walter 25 Mar '16

25 Mar '16

Hello coreboot people, we are looking for a hired hand in helping us getting IOMMU (Xen virtualisation) to work on a APU2c4 [1] - it is a fantastic little AMD SoC based on AMD GX-412TC and the folks at pcengines did a fantastic job with it. Philip (zaolin(a)das-labor.org) even got secure boot for it working, incredible. Anyway, we would like to get XEN with IOMMU to work - it is pretty safe to assume the CPU actually supports it, we are just stuck at weather it is all related to coreboot, or if there is a bit of a hickup with xen [2] itself. I summarised everything we have so far at [3] - would be great if you could have a look. In terms of compensation, we are completely open, you tell us, what works for you, e.g. the usual suspects, or bountysource, etc. Many thanks!! Jürgen [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/apu2c4.htm [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/1160599 [3] https://bitbucket.org/snippets/juwalter/xrMKg

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

coreboot March 2016