On 05.10.2009 14:56, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
another course of action (eg. moving the tools into the coreboot v2 repository, so everyone gets them),
No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not put them back in again.
For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them separate:
Sorry, -ENOPARSE. Are you saying they should not be separate from each other or they should not be separate from the v2 tree?
- nvramtool
- superiotool
- getpir
- mptable
- inteltool
- ectool
and maybe also for msrtool. We can put that in a separate repository, too, if you prefer it to be not associated with coreboot directly.
I think a common coreboot-utils repo would be great, but having them in a not-checked-out-by-default-with-v2 directory in the v2 repo is absolutely OK for me.
Regards, Carl-Daniel