On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
Myles Watson wrote:
Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken
These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM. How can there be that big of a difference between my build system and this one?
I don't know.
Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks? It seems a little large.
I just talked to Patrick about this on IRC - the second numeric parameter is legacy only, it's not used for reserving space.
./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom create 262144 131072 ./coreboot.rom.bootblock ./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom add-stage normal/coreboot_ram normal/coreboot_ram ... ./coreboot.rom: 256 kB, bootblocksize 131072, romsize 262144, offset 0x0 Alignment: 64 bytes
Name Offset Type Size normal/coreboot_ram 0x0 stage 31764 fallback/coreboot_ram 0x7c80 stage 31765 0xf900 null 67256
The bootblock is 128K because normal/coreboot.rom and fallback/coreboot.rom are each 64K. It seems larger than necessary, but it shouldn't matter becuase there's still almost 64K left.
Thanks, Myles