Hello! Acked by: Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
I am offering one because Joe asked and it seemed almost like a good idea. Feel free to turn it down or accept it with comments. -- Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net "The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
-----Original Message----- From: coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot-bounces@coreboot.org]
On
Behalf Of Joseph Smith Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 10:06 PM To: Stefan Reinauer Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org Subject: Re: [coreboot] removal of svn:externals in v2's util/
On 10/08/2009 08:37 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not put them back in again.
For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them separate:
- nvramtool
- superiotool
- getpir
- mptable
- inteltool
- ectool
and maybe also for msrtool.
Ie. all that are external. :)
But.. Um, what are you proposing?
We can put that in a separate repository, too, if you prefer it to be not associated with coreboot directly.
Hm. If there is a single util place I think that's where msrtool should go, associated or not.. Or? But if there are several util places I am already confused..
Was it a mistake to create trunk/util?
I think so... it did not help.. the only difference is now all those tools are not checked out by a coreboot checkout anymore.
I believe we should svn mv coreboot-v2 coreboot-devel and svn mv util/* coreboot-v2/util
Any acks?
Yes I like this idea. Acked by: Joseph Smith joe@settoplinux.org
Anyone else?
-- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot