Are folks getting along with 'arch' ok? Are you able to download as needed? How does it compare to CVS? Is there a different SCM you would like to see used?
This seems like a lead in... *grin* Are you getting along with arch? I've yet to actually commit anything to linuxbios since I just reciently fixed up my key.
Reciently though on some projects here at Bitworks we have had a few CVS gotcha's cause some pain. So I've been looking for a replacement and playing with various scm a bit. I've messed with arch,svn,bazzar-ng, and darcs. With web page reads of the myriad of other scms that are popping up.
IMHO arch is just too unwieldly. I can't imagine trying to explain it to the other developers here at Bitworks. baz might make this easier but that's not one I've looked at that. Perhpas I'll mess with baz for trying a commit of the 440bx stuff.
I'm not advocating (yet) but darcs is currently leading the pack on replacing CVS here at Bitworks. A nifty additional benefit is that darcs can now (mostly) work with kernel git trees.