On 05.12.2007 19:04, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
This has been changed in rev 2972. Buildrom has still the 'old' version. Flashing works fine for me if irq 0xc9 = 0x0 is set. With irq 0xc9 = 0x40 it fails.
OK, is that a difference between board revisions, BIOS revisions or just a misinterpretation of some superiotool dump?
I can see that your latest superiotool dump with the proprietary BIOS has irq 0xc9 = 0x40 set. I tried to mirror that. Now the interesting question is: Why does that setting not work for you?
To track this down, I need:
- superiotool dump of proprietary BIOS for board revisions 1.0, 1.1,
2.0, 2.x
- the exact BIOS version of the proprietary BIOS.
I double checked proprietary BIOS (F9), LB with 0xc9 = 0x40 and LB with 0xc9 = 0x0. But all I said previously is still true for my board (rev 1.0):
For proprietary BIOS: 0xc9 = 0x40 flashing ok. For LB with : 0xc9 = 0x0 flashing ok. For LB with : 0xc9 = 0x40 flashing/erase fails.
Narf. This is getting less than pleasant. Probably some SIO config has to be changed as well. I had hoped to avoid that.
Ping me in two weeks if no patch for SIO dumping has appeared till then.
Regards, Carl-Daniel